Well I have to say the title of this entry is apt. The state of the union is, in fact, the question under consideration in two, possibly three states. As I sit here at my lonely keyboard, Indiana’s democratic reps are holed up in, of all places, Urbana Illinois according to the LA Times, where I write. So that leads me to the question, where are Wisconsin’s fourteen democratic senators? Probably across Right Street in Champaign IL for the duration. Now I don’t know what you may think of collective bargaining associations, AKA unions. Me personally, I have little enough experience with them. I’ve read enough about them to realize that they are as fallible and as susceptible to corruption as any other entity of human beings, but having said that, I suppose I support the notion of union in principle. I recall the grad student strike of 2009 in which I took part I might add. It was a just cause with legitimate grievances, and the resolution attained would’ve been out of the question had a strong and well organized union not been active. So as someone who has personally seen what unions can do up close and personally when they act rightly, I suppose I’d have to say I’d prefer to have the union and not need its resources, than to find myself in a situation where I wish I’d had a union to hand and not have one.
Now I’m a native son of the southern US, and while I am not southern in all my ways and thought patterns, my background leads me to a few choice and naturally sardonic observations. It seems to me that these people in the mid-west don’t know what to do with their money. That is, they have no idea how to hang on to it. Illinois, for example, is one of the most historically corrupt states in the union. State and local corruption on the widest scale dates back as far as the drawing of the state’s borders; hint: Illinois doesn’t have frontage on Lake Michigan because the cartographers came by it honestly. Most of Illinois’s recent governors are behind bars, and I wonder whether Blogoyovich has joined them yet. Probably not. The state has been running its budget on empty for years, and currently owes state entities, such as, oh, let’s see, the University of Illinois, hundreds of millions if not billions of dollars in back budgetary allotments. As an aside, I remember a mass mail sent out to the U of I community at the beginning of the academic year by our vice chancellor. It was one of those things that tried to be upbeat as he told us all the wonderful things U of I is doing to “combat current financial difficulties.” I couldn’t help noting that one of those measures was to offload nearly a hundred tenured faculty and just as many support staff using terms such as “voluntary separation incentive,” and “early retirement incentive.” Read between the lines for yourselves. Now that brings me to Wisconsin. Admittedly, I’ve never set foot in Wisconsin, though were I to do so it’d merely be to visit a cheese shop. I do, however, have a good friend in Madison, Hi Amy, and so I follow the developments there with something more than passing interest. First of all, as a matter of principle, if sixty thousand people take to the streets of your capital, whatever the reason, you’ve got some cause to consider what they have to say. Wisconsin is not a large state, and sixty thousand people swarming the streets of the state capital is not a force that can, or ought, to be ignored. Now without deconstructing the minutiae of the governor’s reasoning, Wisconsin has a fiscal problem. Translation, cheese and beer just aren’t doing it for revenue. Governor Scot Walker wants to pass a bill that, among other things, would force state workers to pay half their pension costs and a substantial portion of their own health care coverage. Ok as far as it goes, which is to say I won’t quibble with numbers and percentages. The alarming part of the bill is that it would strip state workers of their rights to bargain collectively. This is known as union busting, though that term is déclassé. It is this provision of the bill, the part that would deprive workers of the rights to bargain with the state purse string holders, that is causing tens of thousands of people to go to the streets.
Now let’s think about Indiana. Indiana deserves a paragraph because as yet, the goings on in Indianapolis haven’t gotten as much press as those in Madison. They are, nevertheless, as significant. Now I’m not as clear on the basis for the protests in Indianapolis, because again, information is harder to find, but it has to do with giving companies in that state under collective bargaining terms the right to prefer hiring non-union members over union applicants. Admittedly, this is not as obvious a powder keg as what’s happening in Madison, but it’s caused enough of a firestorm that the democratic representatives, all but three according to the Indianapolis Star, to leave the state in protest. Governor Mitch Daniels isn’t saying crap, though I note with dismay that state house speaker Brian Bosma was considering having state police round up the absent legislators. No wonder they fled across the border. I originally wondered whether it’d occurred to any of them to just, I don’t know, vote ‘nay’ on the bill and have done with it? Probably. My guess is they don’t have enough votes to kill it on the state house floor (this applies to both Indiana and Wisconsin) but they do have sufficient power to see to it that no quorum is reached and thus, no vote taken. Good for them.
Now I said back at the start of all this that I am a southern man in many ways, and now it’s time to tell you what that has to do with the price of tea in China, or more aptly, the price of labor in Wisconsin. I note with interest that Nashville isn’t currently filled with angry protesters. So far as I know, people aren’t swarming the streets of Montgomery, Raleigh, Atlanta, Jackson or even, God forbid, Little-Rock in angry protest of states’ fiscal decisions. That’s because, whatever else the south’s failings might be, to put it succinctly, it ain’t broke, or not as, anyway. There are two types of brokenness as demonstrated by current events, broke, and flat-ass broke. Broke is what you are as a state when you need a new budget bill, and pass one. E.g. consider Tennessee in the summer of 03 (I think it was 2003 anyway), when state institutions came within a day of closing their doors for lack of money. I was there. They stayed open. So far as I know, nothing like that’s recurred in my home state. Flat-ass broke is what you get when you’re from the mid-west, apparently. When it comes to money management, Illinois and Wisconsin could learn a few things from Arkansas and Mississippi, states who, while being the butt of every other southern state’s worst jokes, still manage to avoid governor Walker’s and governor Quinn’s sets of difficulties. People crack jokes about southern states keeping their money buried in mason jars rather than in investments, but mason jars have this in their favor. When you need to dig them up, they’re still there. Unlike the budget allotments in, say, Wisconsin’s and Illinois’s state treasuries. People of the north could apply this principle if they tried, you think? Next time, I’ll ponder the state of the nation and the world. Have a good night.